A Navy Court of Inquiry is a formal board of investigation charged with examining an incident and making opinions and recommendations, which can lead to further disciplinary action such as a court-martial or to policy changes. The court itself cannot take disclipinary action or change policy.
The three USS Greeneville officers who are the subject of the investigation are Cmdr. Scott Waddle, Lt. Cmdr. Gerald Pfeifer and Lt. j.g. Michael Coen. Three admirals were designated as members of the court.
During the procedure:
- Testimony is given under oath.
- The board may order military witnesses and subpoena civilian witnesses to testify.
- A party in the inquiry may, but is not required, to testify. Parties retain their rights against self-incrimination.
- The court proceeds much like a judicial proceeding: Witnesses will be questioned, then cross-examined. If necessary, further direct and cross-examination will follow, then questioning by the court members. Witnesses are allowed to add anything they believe is relevant.
- The court itself has its own counsel, who presents evidence and does the direct examination of witnesses except those called by one of the parties. His role is to disclose facts in an impartial manner.
- At the conclusion, the court members deliberate privately and produce a report of findings of fact, opinions and recommendations. The report is forwarded to the officer who convened the court for final action.
Additional Resources:
Copyright 2002 by TheHawaiiChannel.com. The Associated Press contributed to this report. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
